The Journal of Advanced Pharmaceutical Sciences and Natural Products (JAPSNP) is committed to maintaining the highest standards of scientific publishing. Our editorial policies ensure integrity, transparency, and excellence in all published research while supporting the global scientific community.
Editorial Policies
Our commitment to scientific excellence and publishing integrity
Our Mission
Peer Review Process
Initial Screening
Manuscripts undergo editorial screening for scope, originality, and technical quality within 48 hours of submission.
Reviewer Assignment
Qualified experts in the field are invited to provide comprehensive peer review evaluations.
Review Timeline
Standard review period is 2-3 weeks, with regular status updates provided to authors.
Editorial Decision
Final decisions are made based on scientific merit, originality, and reviewer recommendations.
Publication Ethics
Authorship Standards
- All listed authors must have made substantial contributions
- Corresponding author takes responsibility for the work
- Changes to authorship require written consent from all authors
- Ghost or gift authorship is strictly prohibited
Research Misconduct
- Zero tolerance for plagiarism and data fabrication
- Rigorous screening using advanced detection tools
- Investigation protocols following COPE guidelines
- Appropriate sanctions including article retraction
Conflict of Interest
- Full disclosure of financial and personal conflicts
- Transparent reporting of funding sources
- Editorial independence from commercial interests
- Clear conflict management procedures
Duplicate Publication
- Original research must not be previously published
- Proper citation required for related prior work
- Clear guidelines for acceptable republication
- Systematic checking against existing literature
Open Access Policy
JAPSNP is committed to open access publishing, ensuring that research is freely available to the global scientific community. All articles are published under Creative Commons licensing terms.
Editorial Independence
Our editorial decisions are based solely on scientific merit and are free from commercial, political, or personal bias. The editorial board maintains complete independence in all publication decisions.
Appeals and Complaints
We provide fair and transparent procedures for handling appeals and complaints regarding editorial decisions or publication processes.
1. Initial Appeal
Submit detailed appeal to the Editor-in-Chief within 30 days of decision
2. Review Process
Independent review by editorial board members not involved in original decision
3. Final Decision
Written response provided within 4-6 weeks of appeal submission
Quality Assurance
Review Timeline
Average 2-3 weeks from submission to first decision
Expert Reviewers
Global network of qualified peer reviewers
Quality Standards
Rigorous editorial and production processes
Integrity Checks
Comprehensive plagiarism and ethics screening
Contact Editorial Office
For questions about our editorial policies or to report concerns, please contact our editorial team: